Serious Trouble
Serious Trouble
The No-Judgment Fund
Preview
0:00
-30:27

The No-Judgment Fund

Trump says he's creating a $1.8 billion fund to hand out to whoever he wants. Can he? Plus, trouble for Eric Swalwell's weirdo friends, Elon Musk loses, and Clavicular gets mogged by a hot judge.

Dear listeners,

Donald Trump has announced the creation of a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization fund” to be doled out as he sees fit to “victims” of the “weaponization” of the Justice Department. To be financed how, you might ask? From the Judgment Fund, a strange legal creature we’ve talked about a few times before — it’s a permanent, unlimited appropriation the federal government can use to pay judgments and settlements. But like… doesn’t that have to be for real lawsuits with plausible claims that could win in court? If the fund is a blank check like the president claims, is it even constitutional? We discuss. We also look at the troublesome issue of who would have standing to enforce the law against what the president is trying to do — probably not these guys, unfortunately.

Also this week: an ex-AUSA has been criminally charged for sending herself electronic copies of confidential reports about the findings from Jack Smith’s documents investigation into the president. She gave the files names like “bundt cake recipe,” which is a bad fact, indicating consciousness of guilt. But the statutes she’s been charged under were designed to deal with situations where employees steal physical, valuable things from the government and thus deprive the government of their use — it’s not clear they apply to emails of copies. Note, these documents were not classified.

That’s for free subscribers. Paying subscribers get our discussions about:

We hope you enjoy the episode,

Josh

This post is for paid subscribers