Rudy Giuliani faces contempt sanctions, and maybe the loss of his condo; Eric Adams wants a bill of particulars; George Santos gets two additional months of freedom to build his podcast.
Recording a podcast and monitoring the swiftly changing legal landscape all while escaping a blazing inferno. Ken, you are a man of many talents. Stay safe!
Hi Doug -- if your question is about the law or a news story we covered or might cover on the podcast, please ask it here. If it's about your subscription or something like that, please email ricohotline@serioustrouble.show.
Thank you so much Josh for your reply. I'm getting the sense that questions are fine to submit if they are about the law, or a story you have covered or may cover. It's helpful to know this. Thanks again.
As far as I know, it doesn't have to be about the day's topics...I have certainly seen other posters ask questions about other stuff. Whether you get an answer may depend though.
Thank you Angie. Are you a fellow listener or are you somehow part of the podcast operation? I'm not sure how this works. Well, in any case, I do appreciate your reply and the hint of information conveyed.
So, it feels like a risk to ask, unrelated to a show. And you don't want to be a pest, if you ask again, if not answered, I suppose you would want to wait until you feel you have achieved a consideration, and then, maybe, only once again. Sometimes, in life, you have a question ~ about law, which nobody seems to have an answer for. So you risk to ask in a most considerate way.
Just a fellow listener, but, I read all the posts on every pod. They won't get mad at you at all, they just might not want to take the question,( for all kinds of reasons, ) but, I have seen them take some, and they have a thing every once in a while where anyone can submit questions, and then later they answer some of them on a pod. You can also reply to the email with a question etc too
Thank you Angie - Sorry I disappeared for a while. You know, I think they clarified their position a few shows ago. They virtually opened a show stating something like, “What we talk about are active cases in the system, right now.” “That is our primary commerce and focus.”
I think that was a very nice way of saying that a question like mine, about something Justice Roberts may have said during oral arguments some years ago, was not what they were doing, generally.
If I could formulate my question. If I could find the Roberts quote and ask in this forum, I think it would be outside their intended conversation.
Angie, just now, reviewing some of your comments, I must say that your heart, your willingness to be a partner in an inquiry like this, is full, forthcoming, and present, with those with whom you are communicating with, or working with. I feel strengthened somehow because of your heart in this.
In this episode Ken said, speaking of Judge Merchan, "he wants him to be officially a convicted felon, which he's not technically until judgment has been entered after sentencing." Patrick Frey (Patterico) has posted a couple of times that this is not the case in NY and that Trump had been a convicted felon since the guilty verdict was entered, referencing NY Criminal Procedure Law 1.20(13)-(15) (https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/criminal-procedure-law/cpl-sect-1-20/). https://x.com/Patterico/status/1829717306240577699
Your bantering about "dr goldberg" being guiliani's doc raises several legal questions...
1. are you defaming me by suggesting that i would take care of him?
2. if i find several other "dr goldbergs", can it be made a class action?
3. since both of you were defaming me.. is it RICO?
dr harvey goldberg
ps. love your show..
RICOsplainers never admit when it's THEM doing The RICO...
George Santos really missed an opportunity to call his podcast "Fraud Guarantee"
Recording a podcast and monitoring the swiftly changing legal landscape all while escaping a blazing inferno. Ken, you are a man of many talents. Stay safe!
Thank you. Can I ask about anything here, or does my question have to do with this particular show's content?
Hi Doug -- if your question is about the law or a news story we covered or might cover on the podcast, please ask it here. If it's about your subscription or something like that, please email ricohotline@serioustrouble.show.
Thanks,
Josh
Thank you so much Josh for your reply. I'm getting the sense that questions are fine to submit if they are about the law, or a story you have covered or may cover. It's helpful to know this. Thanks again.
As far as I know, it doesn't have to be about the day's topics...I have certainly seen other posters ask questions about other stuff. Whether you get an answer may depend though.
Thank you Angie. Are you a fellow listener or are you somehow part of the podcast operation? I'm not sure how this works. Well, in any case, I do appreciate your reply and the hint of information conveyed.
So, it feels like a risk to ask, unrelated to a show. And you don't want to be a pest, if you ask again, if not answered, I suppose you would want to wait until you feel you have achieved a consideration, and then, maybe, only once again. Sometimes, in life, you have a question ~ about law, which nobody seems to have an answer for. So you risk to ask in a most considerate way.
Just a fellow listener, but, I read all the posts on every pod. They won't get mad at you at all, they just might not want to take the question,( for all kinds of reasons, ) but, I have seen them take some, and they have a thing every once in a while where anyone can submit questions, and then later they answer some of them on a pod. You can also reply to the email with a question etc too
Thank you Angie - Sorry I disappeared for a while. You know, I think they clarified their position a few shows ago. They virtually opened a show stating something like, “What we talk about are active cases in the system, right now.” “That is our primary commerce and focus.”
I think that was a very nice way of saying that a question like mine, about something Justice Roberts may have said during oral arguments some years ago, was not what they were doing, generally.
If I could formulate my question. If I could find the Roberts quote and ask in this forum, I think it would be outside their intended conversation.
Angie, just now, reviewing some of your comments, I must say that your heart, your willingness to be a partner in an inquiry like this, is full, forthcoming, and present, with those with whom you are communicating with, or working with. I feel strengthened somehow because of your heart in this.
Thank you for the nice compliments Doug
Thank you Angie. How very helpful and forthcoming. "Responding to the email with a question," - Do you mean th
Sorry, tapped [send] accidentally - .. do you mean the email notification we receive which announces a new show? Do you mean email in another sense?
If you get notified in your email, you can reply directly from there...serioustrouble@substack.som
I understand. Thank you Angie. Now, I'm afraid to ask my question. I've made such a big deal of it. It can't possibly live up to the hype..
In this episode Ken said, speaking of Judge Merchan, "he wants him to be officially a convicted felon, which he's not technically until judgment has been entered after sentencing." Patrick Frey (Patterico) has posted a couple of times that this is not the case in NY and that Trump had been a convicted felon since the guilty verdict was entered, referencing NY Criminal Procedure Law 1.20(13)-(15) (https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/criminal-procedure-law/cpl-sect-1-20/). https://x.com/Patterico/status/1829717306240577699